KARBON AGENCY

Meta & Google Ads benchmarks for Med Spas (2026): CPL, CPM, CTR, ROAS

Med spa leads average $32.14 on Meta at a 6.41% conversion rate and $40.04 on Google Search, where the category converts at 12.43% (LocaliQ, Physicians & Surgeons). Break-even on a 60% gross margin is 1.7×. On the assumptions below the first visit returns 4.8× and the full patient relationship about 17.6×.

Written by Karbon Agency, Editorial team · Updated September 27, 2026

Get a free ad plan for med spas

Tell us what you want more of. We reply within one business day with a budget, the channels to use and a realistic cost per lead. Free, no contract talk.

What Med Spas actually pay

MetricTypical rangeWhat "good" looks likeSource
Cost per lead$32.14 on Meta lead ads · $40.04 on Google SearchUnder $32 on Meta and under $40 on search. Meta is the cheaper lead here, but search converts almost twice as often.LocaliQ / WordStream, 2026LocaliQ publishes no med-spa row. This is its Physicians & Surgeons category ($32.14 per Meta lead), the closest published benchmark for a physician-led clinical practice. Its Beauty & Personal Care row, which /cost/med-spa uses for aesthetics-led spas, is $50.91 — two categories, not two measurements of the same thing.
Cost per 1,000 impressions (CPM)About $11.59 on Meta$10–$14 — close to the roughly $11.58 the all-industry traffic averages imply.LocaliQ / WordStream, 2026LocaliQ publishes no med-spa row. This is its Physicians & Surgeons category ($32.14 per Meta lead), the closest published benchmark for a physician-led clinical practice. Its Beauty & Personal Care row, which /cost/med-spa uses for aesthetics-led spas, is $50.91 — two categories, not two measurements of the same thing.Derived: $0.61 traffic CPC × 1.90% traffic CTR × 1,000. LocaliQ publishes no CPM column. This figure is derived from its traffic-campaign CPC and CTR for the category, because CPM is exactly CPC × CTR × 1,000.
Click-through rate4.18% on Meta lead ads · 6.61% on Google SearchAbove 4% on Meta — the highest Meta lead-ad CTR LocaliQ publishes, just ahead of real estate.LocaliQ / WordStream, 2026LocaliQ publishes no med-spa row. This is its Physicians & Surgeons category ($32.14 per Meta lead), the closest published benchmark for a physician-led clinical practice. Its Beauty & Personal Care row, which /cost/med-spa uses for aesthetics-led spas, is $50.91 — two categories, not two measurements of the same thing.
Cost per click$1.68 on Meta lead ads · $4.76 on Google SearchUnder $5 on search. Injectable and device terms run well above the category average.LocaliQ / WordStream, 2026LocaliQ publishes no med-spa row. This is its Physicians & Surgeons category ($32.14 per Meta lead), the closest published benchmark for a physician-led clinical practice. Its Beauty & Personal Care row, which /cost/med-spa uses for aesthetics-led spas, is $50.91 — two categories, not two measurements of the same thing.
Landing-page / form conversion rate6.41% on Meta lead ads · 12.43% on Google SearchAbove 12% on search. Meta's 6.41% is below the 8.54% all-industry lead-ad average — treat it as the category norm, not a fault.LocaliQ / WordStream, 2026LocaliQ publishes no med-spa row. This is its Physicians & Surgeons category ($32.14 per Meta lead), the closest published benchmark for a physician-led clinical practice. Its Beauty & Personal Care row, which /cost/med-spa uses for aesthetics-led spas, is $50.91 — two categories, not two measurements of the same thing.

Break-even ROAS for Med Spas

Break-even ROAS
1.7×
Target ROAS
3.5×

1.67× is 1 ÷ a 60% gross margin. The headline of this page is what sits either side of it: the first visit alone returns roughly 4.8×, and the full patient relationship roughly 17.6×. A med spa whose patients do not come back is living on the first number, with far less room for missed consultations.

The assumptions behind those two numbers

These are assumptions, not measurements. Every number in the worked example below depends on them — substitute your own before acting on any of it.
InputAssumed valueBasis
Average ticket$527 on the first visitAssumption. AmSpa's per-visit and per-patient figures sit behind a paid report, so $527 is a modelling input, not a citation. A practice weighted to injectables will be above it; one selling facials well below.
Gross margin60%Assumption. Consumables and injector compensation take most of the rest. Device-based treatments carry higher margin once the device is paid off, which is a capital question rather than a marketing one.
Repeat rate3.7 visits per patientAssumption, chosen so total patient value lands near $1,950 — consistent with the widely repeated claim that roughly three quarters of med spa revenue comes from returning patients. Measure your own 90-day rebook rate instead.
Close rate29% of leads become patientsAssumption, roughly one in 3.4 leads. Consultation show rate is usually the binding constraint here, not lead quality.

Worked example

  1. Assumptions: a $527 first visit, a 60% gross margin, 3.7 visits per patient, and 29% of leads becoming patients.
  2. Break-even ROAS is 1 ÷ 0.60 = 1.67×.
  3. First visit only: one lead is worth 0.29 × $527 = $153. Against the $32.14 Meta lead that is 4.76× — above break-even, though a missed consultation or two eats into it quickly.
  4. Full relationship: 3.7 visits puts patient value near $1,950, so one lead is worth 0.29 × $1,950 = $566. Against the same $32.14 lead that is 17.6×.
  5. Break-even cost per lead on the first visit alone is $153 × 0.60 = $92. Across the relationship it is $340. The published $32.14 benchmark clears both.
  6. The conclusion a med spa should actually act on: the gap between 4.8× and 17.6× is entirely rebooking. If patients are not returning, fix that before raising budget — no bid change is worth 3.7×.

What moves these numbers

  • Rebook rate. It is the difference between 4.8× and 17.6× on identical media spend, and it is decided at the front desk, not in the ad account.
  • Consultation show rate. A booked consult that does not arrive costs the same as one that does, and this is where most med spa budgets leak.
  • Treatment mix. A $150 facial lead and a $1,200 injectable package lead cost roughly the same to buy and are not the same asset.
  • Meta's health and wellness advertising rules, which restrict before-and-after imagery and any implication about a person's medical condition — the two things med spa creative most wants to do.
  • Running search at all. Google costs $40.04 a lead against $32.14 on Meta, but converts at 12.43% against 6.41% — refusing to run it on principle is an expensive habit.

Frequently asked

How much does a med spa lead cost in 2026?

$32.14 on Meta lead ads and $40.04 on Google Search, using LocaliQ's Physicians & Surgeons category — there is no published med-spa-specific row. Under $32 on Meta is good. Meta is the cheaper lead, but search converts almost twice as often.

What is a good ROAS for a med spa?

Break-even on a 60% gross margin is 1 ÷ 0.60 = 1.67×. On a $527 first visit and a 29% lead-to-patient rate, the first appointment returns about 4.8×; across an assumed 3.7 visits it reaches 17.6×. Target 3.5× on first-visit revenue alone.

What is the break-even cost per lead for a med spa?

About $92 counting only the first visit, and about $340 counting the full patient relationship, at a 29% close and a 60% margin. The published $32.14 Meta benchmark sits comfortably under both.

Why is the med spa conversion rate so low on Meta?

6.41% is below the 8.54% all-industry lead-ad average and about half the 12.43% on Google Search. Aesthetic treatments carry a long consideration period and a real price objection, so a scroll-stopping ad rarely produces a same-session decision. Judge Meta on booked consultations rather than form fills.

What CPM should a med spa expect on Meta?

About $11.59 per 1,000 impressions, derived from LocaliQ's $0.61 traffic cost per click and 1.90% traffic click-through rate for Physicians & Surgeons. That is close to the all-industry figure — the constraint here is conversion, not impressions.

How big is the med spa market?

AmSpa puts the US industry above $17 billion and growing by more than $1 billion a year. Category growth is why cost per lead has stayed moderate despite rising competition — demand has expanded roughly as fast as the advertiser count.

Sources

  1. LocaliQ / WordStream — Facebook Advertising Benchmarks (2026 edition). All-industry lead campaigns: $27.39 CPL (down from $27.66), 8.54% conversion rate, $1.80 CPC, 2.70% CTR; all-industry traffic campaigns: $0.60 CPC, 1.93% CTR. (2026-09-23)
  2. LocaliQ / WordStream — Search Advertising Benchmarks for Every Industry (2026). All-industry average $5.42 CPC, 6.64% CTR, 8.18% conversion rate, $66.69 CPL. (2026-06-01)
  3. American Med Spa Association — Medical Spa State of the Industry. $17B+ US med spa industry, growing $1B+ a year. Per-visit and per-patient figures sit behind the paid report, so this page treats them as assumptions. (2026-01-01)

Keep reading

Marketing for Med Spas

How Karbon Agency runs paid acquisition for med spas.

What it costs for Med Spas

Budget tiers and the acquisition ceiling — a stricter bar than break-even.

Dental Practices benchmarks

Break-even ROAS: 1.7×.

Best agencies by niche

Who else works in this category, and how they compare.

The same metrics across every industry:

Cost per leadCost per 1,000 impressionsClick-through rateCost per clickConversion rateReturn on ad spend

Where do your numbers land?

Swap your own ticket, margin and close rate into the model above and we will tell you whether your ad spend is actually profitable — free, and without a pitch deck.

Get your numbers graded freeRequest a free teardown